Skip to content

Research Plan / Thesis Proposal

During the research period, students must register and present a report containing the research plan to develp during the thesis. The report will contain the necessary information to evaluate the originality, coherence and viability of the proposed thesis. The written report should contain the following sections:

  • Personal details of the doctoral student and the thesis supervisor(s).
  • Title of the thesis proposal.
  • Summary of the proposal.
  • Critical state of the art on the subject.
  • Thesis goals.
  • Methodology and resources needed.
  • Description of tasks to achieve the thesis objectives.
  • Workplan schedule with estimated deadlines.
  • Bibliography.
  • Material published in the field, if applicable.

The manuscript of the research plan must be authorized and signed by the thesis supervisor(s).

The Doctoral Program opens two calls every year for research plan presentations, the first one in January-February (Winter Call) and the second one in June-July (Summer Call).

Who must present the research plan in the Winter call?
  • Students with first registration between January and July of the previous academic year.
  • Students who did not pass the previous Summer call presentation.
Who must present the research plan in the Summer call?
  • Students with first registration between September and December of the current academic year,
  • Students who did not pass the previous Winter call presentation.

The administration of the Program will announce in due time the deadline for documents submission in each of the two calls. The registration of the thesis proposal is annual and entitles to any of the two calls.

The thesis proposal or starting research plan will be examined by a committee composed of three doctor members, one of them a professor of the program representing the CAPD, another member a professor of the program expert in the subject of the proposal, and a third member an expert external to the Program. The evaluation criteria used by the jury can be found in the Guidelines for the evaluation of the thesis proposal / research plan.

The evaluation committee will address the candidate comments and recommentadins about his/her thesis proposal. These comments and recommendations must be considered by the student, together with the thesis advisor. In case the evaluation committee writes them in the assessment report, the Academic Committee is in charge to check how they have been attended.

Throughout the following years, the doctorate student will have to justify the thesis progress compared to the proposed research plan, as a part of the yearly tutorship evaluation. This justification may also include an update, revision or improvement of the research plan, with the validation of the thesis advisor.

Documents and forms: